© 1993, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112
by Sally Stephens, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
One planetary astronomer has likened our solar system to a "cosmic shooting gallery,'' with asteroids and comets whizzing through space, occasionally zooming perilously close to Earth. The cratered surfaces of the Moon, Mercury and Mars show the effects of cosmic collisions. What would happen to us if a large asteroid smashed into the Earth?
Most scientists now agree that, 65 million years ago, a six-mile-wide asteroid hurtling through space at 15 kilometers/second (9 miles/second), a hundred times faster than a speeding bullet, slammed into the Earth. The resulting explosion, with the force of a hundred million million tons of TNT, threw iridium-enriched dust high into the atmosphere, shutting off sunlight for weeks or months and cooling the planet. Acid rain and wildfires also followed the collision. Plants died, as did many of the animals that ate them.
|Meteor Crater, in Northern Arizona, is one of the Earth's youngest impact craters. Studies indicate the crater was formed some 50,000 years ago by an iron mass or masses traveling in excess of 11 kilometers/second (7 miles/second) and releasing 10 to 20 megatons of energy on impact. The resulting bowl-shaped crater is approximately one kilometer across and over 200 meters (660 feet) deep. Note the highway and Visitor's Center on the left rim of the crater. (Photo courtesy Meteor Crater)|
In 1990, scientists narrowed the search to the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico. Earlier reports of magnetic and gravitational anomalies detected by scientists working for Pemex, Mexico's national oil company, revealed an impact crater roughly 170 kilometers (106 miles) in diameter buried nearly a kilometer underground and located near the village of Chicxulub (pronounced CHEEK-shoe-lube), a local Mayan name meaning "tail of the devil.'' Recent research has shown that the crater could not have been formed by volcanic action and is truly an impact crater. Other studies have found that rock samples taken during drilling in the area in 1965 have a composition related to the thick bed of ejecta (material thrown upward and outward by the impact) "splashed'' onto nearby Haiti. Many scientists now agree that the Chicxulub crater is the site of the impact that eventually wiped out the dinosaurs.
|Map of identified impact craters on Earth. Most craters range in size from 140 to 200 kilometers (90 to 120 miles) in diameter and in age from recent to about two billion years old. More craters have been identified in Australia, North America and eastern Europe partly because these areas have been relatively stable for considerable geologic periods, thus preserving the early geologic record, and partly because active search programs have been conducted in these areas. (Art courtesy R.A.F. Grieve, Geological Society of Canada, from the NASA Spaceguard Survey report)|
In recent years, astronomers have undertaken studies aimed at discovering more asteroids. They look in photographs for faint specks of light that move with respect to the background stars. By the late 1980s, they were finding four or more new asteroids each month. They also discovered some cosmic close-calls. On March 23, 1989, an asteroid about a half- mile wide crossed the Earth's orbit about 640,000 kilometers (400,000 miles) from Earth. The Earth had been in that same spot a mere six hours earlier. The closest approach recorded was an asteroid, called 1991BA, about nine meters (30 feet) across, which passed within 170,000 kilometers (106,000 miles) of Earth, less than half the distance to the Moon, on January 17, 1991.
Based on the record of craters on other planets and moons, and an idea of the numbers and orbits of Earth-Crossing Asteroids, scientists estimate that the Earth is hit by an asteroid larger than one kilometer across about once or twice every million years. Such strikes carry the threat of global catastrophe, as the dinosaurs discovered. Smaller rocks, between about 90 meters (300 feet) and one kilometer in diameter, hit the Earth, on average, once every 300 years or so. Their effects are limited to the area where they strike. Because most of the Earth is covered with water, most will land there, with little effect on humans or other life. A 1978 explosion in the South Pacific, once though to be a nuclear test, is now thought to have been a small asteroid hit in the water.
A small asteroid roughly 90 meters (300 feet) across is thought to have exploded about 20 kilometers (12 miles) above the ground in a desolate valley of the Tunguska River in central Siberia on the morning of June 30, 1908. The blast, with a force of 12 million tons of TNT, 800 times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, destroyed a forest the size of Rhode Island and booted a man off a chair at a trading post 112 kilometers (70 miles) away.
Comets, which sweep close to the Sun as part of their orbit, also pose a potential threat. Although they are thought to account for only about 5-10% of the impacts, they approach Earth with greater speeds and higher energies than Earth-crossing asteroids of the same size (the nucleus of a comet, the so-called "dirty snowball'' of ice and dust, is typically about ten kilometers across). But since they are not solid rock, comets will tend to break up into smaller pieces as they smash through the Earth's atmosphere, causing locally severe, but not necessarily globally catastrophic damage. Scientists estimate that one comet passes between the Earth and the Moon each century, and one strikes the Earth about every hundred thousand years. When talking about the these cosmic collisions, it is important to put the risk in perspective. During a human lifetime, the chance that the Earth will be hit by something large enough to destroy crops worldwide is about one in 10,000. Those are the same odds of dying from anesthesia during surgery, of dying in a car crash during any six month interval, or of dying of cancer from breathing car exhaust on Los Angeles freeways every day. While all of these are possible, most people don't alter their everyday life because of them.
What if we do detect an object headed straight for Earth? Another conference held by NASA dealt with interception of threatening objects. The farther away an object is intercepted, the easier it is to deflect or destroy (a closer one has to be given a bigger push to get it to miss the Earth). So far, the only source of energy powerful enough to deflect an asteroid like the one that struck the Earth 65 million years ago is nuclear. A nuclear blast on an asteroid's surface would blow off some of the its material. The motion of the material away from the surface acts almost like a "kick,'' pushing the asteroid in the direction opposite to the moving material. Comets, on the other hand, could fragment into many dangerous pieces if a bomb exploded on their surfaces. But a nuclear-tipped rocket exploded nearby would melt some of the comet's frozen gases turning them into "jets'' that act like rocket exhaust, nudging the comet away from its deadly path. No doubt, entirely new technologies will exist hundreds or thousands of years in the future when we will need to deflect an incoming cosmic cannonball.
|This photograph of the asteroid Gaspra is the first close-up ever taken of an asteroid in space. It was taken by the Galileo spacecraft on October 29, 1991, when the spacecraft was 16,200 kilometers (10,000 miles) away from the asteroid. The potato-shaped Gaspra is a dozen miles long and seven or eight miles wide. Its shape suggests that it was once the core of a much larger body which was shattered by collisions with other asteroids. (Courtesy NASA/JPL)|
Shortly after its discovery appearance, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli noticed that the orbit of Comet Swift-Tuttle was remarkably similar to the orbit of the dust particles responsible for the Perseid meteor shower each August. During the peak of meteor showers, upwards of hundreds (and occasionally thousands) of meteors an hour can be seen (as compared to a few per hour visible on a normal night from a dark location). Schiaparelli's connection established comets as the originators of meteor showers — as comets move close to the Sun, solar heat turns their ice to gas, which explodes away from the surface of the comet in "jets'' of gas that pull some of the comet's dust out with them. The dust is left behind in the comet's orbit. When the Earth crosses the orbit, at the same time each year, it plows through the dust, unleashing a meteor shower.
During the 1970s, the number of meteors seen each year in the Perseid meteor shower increased. It seemed that Comet Swift-Tuttle was about to reappear. But it failed to show, and soon afterward, Perseid meteor activity dropped sharply. Astronomers wondered if the comet had somehow come and gone unnoticed. After all, its orbit was based on only three months of observations a century ago, and there was plenty of room for error.
In 1973, astronomer Brian Marsden, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, suggested that the comet seen in 1862 might be the same comet reported in 1737 by a Jesuit missionary, Ignatius Kegler, in Beijing, China. The connection was possible if "jets'' on the comet, caused by ice turning into gas because of the Sun's heat, exploding away from the comet's surface and acting like rocket exhaust, slightly altered its orbit. Marsden predicted that Comet Swift-Tuttle, with a newly calculated period of 130 years, would return at the end of 1992. Increased numbers of Perseid meteors the past few years indicated the comet might be near.
On September 26, 1992, Japanese amateur astronomer Tsuruhiko Kiuchi, using six-inch binoculars, noticed a comet moving through the Big Dipper in an area where scientists had calculated Comet Swift-Tuttle should be, if it was indeed reappearing. Other astronomers confirmed that the lost comet had been found. Marsden's 1973 prediction was confirmed, although the date of the comet's closest approach to the Sun (its perihelion) was off by 17 days from his prediction. On November 7, 1992, the comet passed 177 million kilometers (110 million miles) from Earth (its closest approach) on its way to a December 12th perihelion.
Armed with new observations of the comet's motion, Marsden went to work revising his calculations of its orbit. He predicted the next perihelion would occur on August 14, 2126. But if the actual date of perihelion was off by 15 days from his prediction (as the 1992 perihelion had been off by 17 days), the comet and the Earth might be in the same place in space at the same time. Since Comet Swift-Tuttle is thought to be about six-miles across, about the same size of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs, a possible collision looked ominous.
Marsden continued to refine his calculations, and discovered that he could trace Comet Swift- Tuttle's orbit back almost two thousand years, to match comets observed in 188 AD and possibly even 69 BC. The orbit turned out to be more stable than he had originally thought, with the effects of the comet's jets less pronounced. Marsden concluded that it is highly unlikely the comet will be 15 days off in 2126, and he called off his warning of a possible collision. His new calculations show Comet Swift-Tuttle will pass a comfortable 15 million miles from Earth on its next trip to the inner solar system. However, when Marsden ran his orbital calculations further into the future, he found that, in 3044, Comet Swift-Tuttle may pass within a million miles of Earth, a true cosmic "near miss.''
Marsden's prediction, and later retraction, of a possible collision between the Earth and the comet highlight that fact that we will most likely have century-long warnings of any potential collision, based on calculations of orbits of known and newly discovered asteroids and comets. Plenty of time to decide what to do.
| 1 | 2 | next page >>
back to Teachers' Newsletter Main Page